Sanford Burnham
  • Sanford Burnham
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Navigate Sanford-Burnham
    • Main Site
    • Our Mission
    • Research
    • Talent
    • Technology
    • Training & Education
    • Our Supporters
    • News

Beaker

Sanford-Burnham Science Blog

Subscribe

5 research areas bringing us closer to personalized medicine

by Heather Buschman, Ph.D. on February 24, 2012 at 2:28 pm | 2 Comments
Eric Green, M.D., Ph.D., director of the National Human Genome Research Institute at the NIH

Eric Green, M.D., Ph.D., director of the National Human Genome Research Institute at the NIH

At Sanford-Burnham’s 3rd annual Rare Disease Day Symposium, held today in La Jolla, Calif., keynote speaker Eric Green, M.D., Ph.D., director of the National Human Genome Research Institute at the NIH, spoke about genomic medicine. Sometimes called “personalized medicine,” or even “precision medicine,” Dr. Green defined this revolutionary field as the idea that health care can be tailored to the individual based on his or her own genomic information.

Dr. Green was there when the human genome was first sequenced in 2001 and he’s now leading the next step—figuring out how to use that information. In his talk, Dr. Green outlined five active research areas that are taking us from what he called “helix to health:”

1. Defining the function of human genome sequence. The actual sequence of the human genome was essentially just a bunch of letters. Researchers are still figuring out how to interpret that message. To do that, they are sequencing the genomes of other organisms to see what we have in common and to get clues to gene function. According to Dr. Green, we’re now at the “Cliff Notes” stage of understanding how sequence determines function. He predicted that we’ll still be working out the nuances 30-40 years from now.

2. Understanding human genomic variation. In other words, scientists are trying to determine how we all differ. They are cataloging variants across populations and entering this information into databases. Researchers are now determining which variations are biologically relevant and which aren’t.

3. Pinpointing the genomic basis for human diseases. According to Dr. Green, human disease can be divided into two categories based on their genomic architecture. Rare diseases are the first category. They result from an inherited mutation or variation in a single gene. There might be some environmental influence or secondary genetic variations that affect disease severity, but for the most part rare disease are one gene, one mutation.Dr. Green explained that we’re doing pretty well in getting a genetic inventory of genes associated with inherited diseases. Scientists know the molecular basis of approximately 3,500 diseases. But there are still about 1,800 to go.

The second category of human disease encompasses more common diseases, including diabetes, asthma, high blood pressure, and most cancers. The genetics underlying these conditions are much more complicated. They result from multiple genetic variations and are more influenced by environmental factors.

More than 1,000 genome-wide association studies of these more common conditions have recently been published. Here, scientists are taking complicated diseases and conducting genetic studies to statistically associate discrete regions of genome with risk for disease. But it’s still hard to pin these diseases to specific genetic variants, Dr. Green says.

4. Achieving routine whole genome sequencing. In order to understand the inheritance of the complicated diseases, scientists need the ability to sequence many genomes of many different patients. When the human genome was first sequenced, Dr. Green and his colleagues set a challenge to achieve the ability to sequence a person’s genome for $1,000 or less. (This was bold, considering that it cost roughly $1 billion to sequence the first genome.) But, Dr. Green says, he’s witnessed amazing wave after wave of technology development in the past 10 years. Companies working on this today are predicting that the $1,000 genome will be achieved by the end of 2012.

5. Understanding how to analyze the data. The largest bottleneck to achieving genomic medicine is the ability to make sense of the vast amounts of data that are being generated. It might even be the largest bottleneck in all of biomedical research.

Even as these challenges are achieved, at least two major hurdles will still remain: translating data into treatments and assessing their effectiveness in patients. As daunting as that might be, Dr. Green’s talk was full of energy.

“We are now marrying images of genomics and medicine in ways we couldn’t have anticipated just 10 years ago,” Dr. Green told the audience.

And he was most hopeful about the future of rare disease research. “Now is the time to push the accelerator to systematically plow through the rest of inherited disorders for which the genetic basis has not yet been identified,” he said.

Dr. Green’s words set a very positive stage for a day of exchange between scientists, physicians, affected patients and their families, support groups, granting agencies, industry, and philanthropists—all dedicated to research on the causes and treatments for rare diseases.

Tags: personalized medicine, Rare disease symposium, Rare Diseases

Post a Comment Cancel reply

* All fields are required

CAPTCHA Image
Refresh Image

*

2 Comments

  1. Lalo says:
    April 4, 2012 at 7:11 am

    I can not think of an scenario where I would be amfoortcble with any organization having such personal information about me.My genome is what makes me who I am. It is my physical, spiritual and emotional essence. I believe that if we ever allow this information into the hands of Big Pharma, Big Business, or even Big Agra, they will use it any way they possibly can to make a profit.We have to remember, corporations are required by law to show a profit whenever they have the means to do so available to them. CEO’s and other top officials at such corporations can be tried and actually go to jail for failing to do so. Knowing this makes it imperative, in my opinion, that we ensure that they NEVER have access to such personal information about us.

    Reply
  2. Alane Strong says:
    February 24, 2012 at 3:49 pm

    Nice write-up,Heather. Interesting.

    Reply

Search

Find more information

  • About Beaker
  • Contact us
  • Donate

Please take a quick survey

Which of these items describes you?

Select all that apply. (Question 1 of 5)

Categories

  • Basic Research
  • Cancer
    • Apoptosis & Cell Death Research
    • Signal Transduction
    • Tumor Development
    • Tumor Microenvironment
  • Children's Health
    • Genetic Diseases
    • Muscle Development & Regeneration
    • RNA Biology
  • Diabetes & Obesity
    • Cardiovascular Pathobiology
    • Metabolic Signaling & Disease
  • Drug Discovery
  • Events
  • Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences
  • Grants
  • Infectious & Inflammatory Diseases
    • Bioinformatics & Systems Biology
    • Infectious Diseases
    • Inflammatory Diseases
  • Nanomedicine
  • Neuroscience, Aging, & Stem Cells
    • Degenerative Diseases
    • Development & Aging
    • Stem Cells
  • Other
  • People
  • Sanford-Burnham Supporters
  • Translational Medicine

Search by Keyword

CCRA CIRM collaboration commitment communication community Daniel Kelly Erkki Ruoslahti Evan Snyder events Florida Hospital Fred Levine Genetic Disease Program Guy Salvesen Hudson Freeze John Reed Kristiina Vuori La Jolla Lake Nona Metabolic Signaling metabolism NIH Orlando personalized medicine Prebys Center press proteins Rare Diseases Rare disease symposium research publications Robert Wechsler-Reya Santa Barbara Sara Courtneidge Sheila Collins Stem Cells Steven Smith Stuart Lipton T. Denny Sanford technology Translational Research Institute tumor microenvironment Tumor Microenvironment Program Video Yu Yamaguchi Ze'ev Ronai

© Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute. All rights reserved.

Get Cloud PHP Hosting on CatN